Bertrand Russell’s 10 Commandments for Dwelling in a Wholesome Democracy

Picture by J. F. Horra­bin, through Wiki­me­dia Com­mons

Bertrand Rus­promote noticed the his­to­ry of civ­i­liza­tion as being formed by an unfor­tu­nate oscil­la­tion between two oppos­ing evils: tyran­ny and anar­chy, every of which con­tains the seed of the oth­er. The most effective course for steer­ing away from both one, Rus­promote foremost­tained, is lib­er­al­ism.

“The doc­trine of lib­er­al­ism is an try to flee from this finish­much less oscil­la­tion,” writes Rus­promote in A His­to­ry of West­ern Phi­los­o­phy. “The essence of lib­er­al­ism is an try to safe a social order not based mostly on irra­tional canine­ma [a fea­ture of tyran­ny], and insur­ing sta­bil­i­ty [which anar­chy under­mines] with­out involv­ing extra restraints than are nec­es­sary for the preser­va­tion of the com­mu­ni­ty.”

In 1951 Rus­promote pub­lished an arti­cle in The New York Instances Magazine­a­zine, “The Finest Reply to Fanaticism–Liberalism,” with the sub­ti­tle: “Its calm seek for reality, seen as dan­ger­ous in lots of locations, stays the hope of human­i­ty.” Within the arti­cle, Rus­promote writes that “Lib­er­al­ism isn’t a lot a creed as a dis­po­si­tion. It’s, certainly, against creeds.” He con­tin­ues:

However the lib­er­al atti­tude doesn’t say that it’s best to oppose writer­i­ty. It says solely that try to be free to oppose writer­i­ty, which is sort of a dif­fer­ent factor. The essence of the lib­er­al out­look within the intel­lec­tu­al sphere is a perception that unbi­ased dis­cus­sion is a use­ful factor and that males must be free to ques­tion any­factor if they’ll sup­port their ques­tion­ing by sol­id argu­ments. The oppo­web site view, which is foremost­tained by those that can­not be referred to as lib­er­als, is that the reality is already identified, and that to ques­tion it’s nec­es­sar­i­ly sub­ver­sive.

Rus­promote crit­i­cizes the rad­i­cal who would advo­cate change at any price. Echo­ing the philoso­pher John Locke, who had a professional­discovered influ­ence on the authors of the Dec­la­ra­tion of Inde­pen­dence and the U.S. Con­sti­tu­tion, Rus­promote writes:

The trainer who urges doc­trines sub­ver­sive to exist­ing writer­i­ty doesn’t, if he’s a lib­er­al, advo­cate the estab­lish­ment of a brand new writer­i­ty much more tyran­ni­cal than the outdated. He advo­cates cer­tain lim­its to the exer­cise of writer­i­ty, and he want­es these lim­its to be noticed not solely when the writer­i­ty would sup­port a creed with which he dis­agrees but additionally when it might sup­port one with which he’s in com­plete agree­ment. I’m, in my opinion, a believ­er in democ­ra­cy, however I don’t like a regime which makes perception in democ­ra­cy com­pul­so­ry.

Rus­promote con­cludes the New York Instances piece by provide­ing a “new deca­logue” with recommendation on how one can dwell one’s life within the spir­it of lib­er­al­ism. “The Ten Com­mand­ments that, as a trainer, I ought to want to professional­mul­gate, is perhaps set forth as fol­lows,” he says:

1: Don’t really feel absolute­ly cer­tain of any­factor.

2: Don’t assume it price­whereas to professional­duce perception by con­ceal­ing evi­dence, for the evi­dence is bound to come back to mild.

3: Nev­er attempt to dis­cour­age assume­ing, for you might be positive to suc­ceed.

4: While you meet with oppo­si­tion, even when it must be out of your hus­band or your chil­dren, endeav­or to over­come it by argu­ment and never by writer­i­ty, for a vic­to­ry depen­dent upon writer­i­ty is unre­al and illu­so­ry.

5: Haven’t any respect for the writer­i­ty of oth­ers, for there are all the time con­trary writer­i­ties to be discovered.

6: Don’t use pow­er to sup­press opin­ions you assume per­ni­cious, for for those who do the opin­ions will sup­press you.

7: Don’t concern to be eccen­tric in opin­ion, for each opin­ion now settle for­ed was as soon as eccen­tric.

8: Discover extra plea­positive in intel­li­gent dis­despatched than in pas­sive agree­ment, for, for those who val­ue intel­li­gence as it’s best to, the for­mer implies a deep­er agree­ment than the lat­ter.

9: Be scrupu­lous­ly reality­ful, even when reality is incon­ve­nient, for it’s extra incon­ve­nient whenever you attempt to con­ceal it.

10. Don’t really feel envi­ous of the hap­pi­ness of those that dwell in a idiot’s par­adise, for less than a idiot will assume that it’s hap­pi­ness.

Smart phrases then. Smart phrases now.

Notice: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this publish appeared on our web site in March, 2013.

If you want to enroll in Open Tradition’s free electronic mail newslet­ter, please discover it right here. Or fol­low our posts on Threads, Face­e-book, BlueSky or Mastodon.

If you want to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our web site. It’s laborious to rely 100% on adverts, and your con­tri­bu­tions will assist us con­tin­ue professional­vid­ing the most effective free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to study­ers each­the place. You may con­tribute by Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Bertrand Russell’s Recommendation to Peo­ple Liv­ing 1,000 Years within the Future: “Love is Smart, Hatred is Idiot­ish”

Bertrand Rus­promote & Buck­min­ster Fuller on Why We Ought to Work Much less, and Reside and Be taught Extra

Philoso­pher Bertrand Rus­promote Talks In regards to the Time When His Grand­fa­ther Met Napoleon

Aldous Hux­ley Tells Mike Wal­lace What Will Destroy Democ­ra­cy: Over­pop­u­la­tion, Medicine & Insid­i­ous Tech­nol­o­gy (1958)