Trustees pressed Chapel Hill on scholar admissions
The chair of the College of North Carolina at Chapel Hill’s Board of Trustees appeared to strain workers to confess particular college students, based on a report from The Meeting based mostly on greater than 100 pages of textual content messages it obtained by means of an open data request.
The North Carolina–targeted information outlet reported that, over an eight-month interval beginning in October 2023, not less than six board members “requested senior workers members on the college for data on particular candidates or the admissions course of.” However board chair John Preyer’s texts notably caught out.
“I want to see [redacted] in,” Preyer wrote to Chris McClure, the college’s liaison to the board, based on The Meeting (the college redacted chunks of the texts). The outlet reported that, in some messages, “Preyer urged McClure to speak with ‘Rachelle’—probably that means Rachelle Feldman, the vice chancellor of enrollment.”
The outlet additionally reported that, at different factors, Preyer wrote to McClure that “a bit of push can be good,” requested “whether or not [redacted] may get a re-evaluation” and—upon listening to that nobody was moved off a wait record—texted “that’s it—no fuck off or go to hell?”
One other trustee, Rob Bryan, requested Feldman immediately a number of instances about college students’ probabilities of getting off a wait record, The Meeting reported. Neither Bryan nor Preyer returned Inside Greater Ed’s requests for remark Thursday.
Kevin Greatest, a Chapel Hill spokesperson, stated nobody on the college was obtainable Thursday for an interview. He emailed a press release.
“Chapel Hill is dedicated to a rigorous and complete admissions course of that’s based mostly on integrity, equity and alternative for all scholar candidates,” Greatest wrote.
“There is no such thing as a written coverage outlining how anybody could contact the administration concerning admissions,” he added. He stated it’s “widespread for board members to hunt steerage from designees of the chancellor about admissions and different questions.”
