A troubling second for public increased ed (opinion)


David Kozlowski/Second Cellular/Getty Photos

Earlier this month, my establishment, Southern Methodist College, made headlines by hiring President Jay Hartzell away from the College of Texas at Austin, one of many nation’s largest and most prestigious public universities. The transfer stunned many on each campuses and despatched shock waves via increased schooling.

Whereas I can’t presume to know all of the motivations behind President Hartzell’s choice and I don’t communicate for SMU, as a school member who research increased schooling, I imagine this second calls for our consideration. Many public universities are beneath severe menace, and personal universities want to understand that their future is carefully tied to the success of their public counterparts.

For greater than a decade, SMU has been my tutorial residence. The campus boasts good and curious college students, devoted school who care about instructing and analysis, and powerful management from the administration and Board of Trustees. We’re in the course of a profitable capital marketing campaign and having fun with each athletic success after our transfer to the Atlantic Coast Convention and a rising analysis profile.

But, at the same time as I anticipate the management that President Hartzell will carry to SMU, I can’t ignore the broader context that has made such a transfer extra widespread and deeply troubling.

Hartzell isn’t the one instance of a significant public college president leaving for the relative security of personal increased schooling. His predecessor at UT Austin Greg Fenves left for Emory College. Carol Folt resigned from the College of North Carolina at Chapel Hill earlier than getting the College of Southern California presidency. Again in 2011, Biddy Martin famously left the College of Wisconsin at Madison for Amherst School in one of many early examples of this development. So, what’s going on and why are main public college presidencies much less engaging than they as soon as had been?

The Struggles of Public Universities

Being a public college president in a crimson state is the hardest job in increased schooling at the moment.

Public universities in these politically charged environments are beneath siege. They face relentless ideological assaults from state legislators and are consistently compelled to navigate useful resource challenges from years of underfunding.

Politicians attacking public increased schooling are usually not merely questioning the budgets or administration—they’re trying to dismantle these establishments. Efforts to scale back tenure protections, anti-DEI laws and restrictions on what will be taught are all a part of a broader effort to strip public universities of their autonomy.

The purpose of those assaults is evident: to scale back the affect and authority of public universities and their leaders and undermine the crucial position they play in shaping a well-informed and educated workforce and citizenry.

On the similar time, some establishments are adopting insurance policies of institutional neutrality, decreasing the flexibility of presidents to talk out on these points.

The cumulative impact of those efforts is to make public universities and their leaders much less efficient in advocating for his or her missions, college students and school.

The Quick-Time period Benefits for Non-public Larger Ed

Within the quick time period, these challenges going through public universities have opened alternatives for personal establishments. With public universities slowed down in political and monetary crises, personal universities can poach high school and directors, providing them higher assets and fewer political interference.

I don’t fault personal universities for capitalizing on these alternatives—they’re performing in their very own self-interest and within the pursuits of their very own missions, college students and school.

However I concern that this method is shortsighted and finally damaging to the broader increased schooling group. At a time when belief in increased schooling is declining, when the worth of a school diploma is being questioned and when the general public is more and more disillusioned with the academy, it’s vital that we don’t permit assaults on public establishments to additional erode public religion in all of upper schooling.

Why Non-public Universities Should Stand Up for Public Larger Ed

Non-public universities are uniquely positioned to advocate for the broader worth of upper schooling and the crucial position public establishments play.

First, personal universities can use their platforms to champion the beliefs of upper schooling. With public universities beneath assault from state legislatures and particular curiosity teams, personal establishments can and will communicate out in opposition to the politicization of upper schooling. Whether or not via analysis, advocacy or public statements, personal universities will be highly effective allies within the combat to guard the autonomy of public establishments.

Second, personal universities can advocate for elevated public investments in increased schooling. They will use their affect to induce policymakers to revive funding for public universities and reject anti–increased schooling insurance policies. At a time of declining public assist, personal universities can push for insurance policies that guarantee all college students, no matter background, have entry to high-quality postsecondary schooling to develop the talents to reach at the moment’s economic system.

Third, personal universities may help bridge the divide between private and non-private increased schooling by forming partnerships with public two- and four-year establishments. These partnerships might embody joint analysis initiatives, switch and reciprocal enrollment applications, or shared assets to broaden entry and alternative.

The Time for Motion Is Now

On this crucial second for increased schooling, personal universities must show management—not only for their very own curiosity, however for the pursuits of all the trade. If we wish to safeguard the distinctive contributions of each private and non-private increased schooling, we have to work collectively to make sure each sectors thrive.

Now’s the time for all those that imagine within the transformational energy of upper schooling to face up and take motion. The way forward for increased schooling is dependent upon it.

Michael S. Harris is a professor of upper schooling within the Simmons College of Schooling and Human Improvement at Southern Methodist College.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *