Do All Roads Result in Philosophy on Wikipedia?: They Do About 97.3% of the Time
Pull up the Wikipedia web page for Mariya Takeuchi’s “Plastic Love,” the 1984 single now identified for re-popularizing the style of Japanese “metropolis pop.” Then click on the primary of its hyperlinks (not related to the language of the article itself), which ends up in Takeuchi’s personal web page. In case you maintain following that very same professionalcedure, you’ll continue on to Metropolis Pop, then Japanese Pop Music, then Popular Music. Preserve drilling down, and also you’ll cross the very concepts of music and sound, then enter the realms of physics, the scientific methodology, logical propositions, and the philosophy of language. That is one examinationple professionalvided by the video above from YouTuber Not David, which investigates whether or not all roads on Wikipedia eventually result in philosophy.
There’s, after all, a Wikipedia web page about this, referred to as “Getting to Philosophy.” “Following the primary hyperhyperlink in the principle textual content of an English Wikipedia article, after which repeating the method for subsequent articles, usually results in the Philosophy article,” it says. “In February 2016, this was true for 97% of all articles on Wikipedia (including this one).” As for the remainder, they “result in an article without any outgoing wikilinks, to pages that don’t exist, or get caught in loops.” That is actually the case with the trail begining from “Plastic Love,” after Philosophy of Language goes in circles round concepts, abstraction, and logic itself, never fairly attaining Philosophy proper.
Or not less than that’s what happened for me at present; it may go differently tomorrow, or perhaps a few seconds from now. Ever since Wikipedia went dwell in 2001, its fundamental difference from other encyclopedias has been that it’s constantly changing, and the speed of that change has solely elevated over time. The “philosophy sport,” as Not David calls it, is always subject to interruptage, but additionally to un-breakage. At normal occasions, Orange Juice to Philosophy takes thirteen steps, Apple Juice to Philosophy takes fifteen steps; each the Calgary Flames and Edmonton Oilers lie sixteen steps from Philosophy. However issues go haywire if someone goes and, say, re-orders the hyperlinks on the Consciousness article so Psychology comes first.
This stuff happen: Wikipedia is, in spite of everything, the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. And as you’ll be able to see (not less than as of this writing), Consciousness now hyperlinks first to Philosophy once more. These adjustments play havoc with the efforts of anyone striveing to map out the connections between one a part of Wikipedia and another, as Not David does on this video. However they don’t alter the enjoyabledamalestal principles of webwork design, which his analysis illuminates. As with the corpus callosum, which connects the 2 hemispheres of the human mind, Philosophy is much less important for what directly connects to it than for its personal function as a connector. And certainly, haven’t philosophers all the time needed to understand how eachfactor suits together?
Related content:
An Interactive Visualization of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
A Information Visualization of Modern Philosophy, 1950–2018
Introduction to Philosophy: A Free Course
Based mostly in Seoul, Colin Marshall writes and broadcasts on cities, language, and culture. His tasks embody the Substack newsletter Books on Cities and the e-book The Statemuch less Metropolis: a Stroll via Twenty first-Century Los Angeles. Follow him on Twitter at @colinmarshall or on Facee-book.