The Expertise of Life Itself
Previous to the printing press, most individuals have been illiterate. Books have been nonetheless produced, however solely by educated elites, principally monks and different non secular varieties, though there have been additionally secular students, like Plato as an illustration, who engaged within the laborious and time-consuming strategy of writing their very own books by hand.
By and enormous, these books weren’t written to be learn by people, however moderately as a core function of an academic course of that concerned somebody studying their very own handwritten manuscript to a roomful of youthful monks (or different students) who would basically take dictation. These college students would then, when it was achieved, personal their very own ebook, which basically certified them to “educate” it to others.
Naturally, this course of did not produce precise copies of the unique ebook, however moderately variations of the ebook. Spelling, as an illustration, wasn’t the inflexible right-or-wrong factor it’s at present, however moderately a type of artistic course of by which these students tried to file the phrases they have been listening to utilizing the newfangled phonetic alphabet, a know-how that reduces the universe of sounds people could make to 26 symbols.
But it surely wasn’t simply spelling. Every “copy” of the unique, which as a rule wasn’t the unique in any respect, however moderately a replica of a replica of a replica, launched misunderstandings, re-interpretations, enhancements, and new concepts, added by every particular person making their model of the manuscript. Nobody was grading them on accuracy. Certainly, these early books have been produced within the spirit of the oral custom that concerned individuals telling and retelling tales, every in their very own means.
Within the centuries earlier than Johann Gutenberg started printing Bibles, “the scriptures,” as Marshall McLuhan writes in his ebook The Gutenberg Galaxy, “had none of (the) uniform and homogeneous character” that we moderns affiliate with it. The know-how of mass printing, mass manufacturing, turned this, and each previously “dwelling” manuscript right into a standardized, “completed” product.
After all, the printing press was a driving pressure behind mass literacy, however within the course of it turned manuscripts right into a type of uniform packaged commodity that eliminated the learner from their lively position in their very own studying by books.
In some ways, the nice educator John Dewey was working to, as McLuhan places it, “restore training to its primitive, pre-print section. He needed to get the coed out of the passive position of shopper of uniformly packaged studying.”
Likewise, that is what we play-based preschool educators are trying to do. Whereas so-called “training reformers” search to pressure literacy and different teachers onto our youngest residents by standardized curricula, play-based early childhood training lays the inspiration of lively participation by kids in their very own studying. Simply as these historical students actually took a hands-on position in creating their very own books, we would like our college students to get their very own fingers soiled, to expertise the world past the bounds of linearity, standardization, and 26 symbols.
It may very well be argued, as McLuhan did, that “the extremely literate Westerner steeped within the lineal and homogeneous modes of print tradition has a lot hassle with the non-visual world of recent arithmetic and physics” exactly as a result of of this sort of standardization. Once I find out about indigenous worldviews, views formed outdoors Western standardization, I am usually startled by how a lot their understanding mirrors these of recent arithmetic and physics. It makes me marvel if being extremely literate in a method makes me illiterate in others.
This isn’t to dismiss the great that Gutenberg’s printing press introduced the world, however moderately to emphasise that it, like all know-how, limits us in some methods even because it expands us in others.
Right this moment, we fret about good telephones and different screen-based applied sciences. We fear that they’re altering us. We particularly fear that they’re altering our youngsters.
Let there be little doubt, our worries are well-founded.
Previous to the invention of the phonetic alphabet, almost each Greek particular person may recite their very own model of Homer’s epic poems (The Iliad and The Odyssey). There could have been an historic Homer, however by the point the phrases have been written down, the unique model had lengthy since been reworked by the telling and re-telling. “Homer” was, in essence, an invention of everybody. Right this moment, as a direct results of the printed phrase, nearly nobody can recite Homer from reminiscence. The know-how of literacy obliterated our skill to maintain these poems alive in oral type. I now maintain books containing a standardized model Homer on my bookshelf as an alternative of in my head. In consequence, Homer is way much less “alive” to me than it was to these historical Greeks.
I’ve books on my shelf which are the trendy standardized variations of the manuscripts these monks and students transcribed within the sixteenth century, however let there be little doubt, there’s nothing “lively” or “fingers on” about these drained, previous classics. After all, once I gird myself and really learn these books, I discover that they’re filled with nice and forgotten knowledge, however as a result of they’re typeset, unchanging and unchangeable, for all eternity, they really feel lifeless.
As a play-based preschool educator, I view the early years as a time for kids to expertise the world earlier than the smartphone, earlier than the printing press, earlier than the alphabet. I’ve no phantasm that they’ll ever actually know the world with out these applied sciences, however this time is a window by which they’ve the chance to get their fingers soiled with out the restrictions that these applied sciences impose on people.
Nearly each little one, as an illustration, memorizes complete books lengthy earlier than they’re able to learn. They flip the pages as in the event that they’re studying, however the phrases they converse aloud are phrases they know as a result of they’ve heard them. Once they do that, they’re partaking within the oral custom.
Nearly each younger little one goes by a section by which they imagine that the world disappears (or they disappear) after they shut their eyes. We standardized adults discover it a captivating misperception, however that is precisely what trendy cognitive psychologists inform us occurs once we shut our eyes: the world as we understand it does not exist once we aren’t perceiving it. It is our brains that assemble all these photons into understandable visible phenomenon. It is mind-blowing to us, however for a younger kids it is an apparent actuality. Once they do that, they’re partaking with each superior science and indigenous knowledge.
Nearly each younger little one delights in arithmetic. On the finish of the day, as I survey the playground and classroom, I discover proof of impromptu sorting, sequencing, and patterning, which is the essence of all arithmetic. But, the extra distant kids turn into from this sort of hands-on studying, the extra complicated and irritating they discover math, with most of us deciding math is not for us even earlier than we’re out of elementary college. Preschool kids enjoyment of math as a result of they’ve skilled it with their very own fingers, heads, and hearts.
Jonathan Haight (The Anxious Technology) and others make robust psychological and sociological circumstances towards smartphones and different screens for younger kids. Early childhood educators have lengthy identified that almost all preschoolers are merely not developmentally geared up for formal literacy instruction, to not point out directive tutorial instruction, and that to try to impose that on them is a waste of time at finest, and doubtlessly dangerous.
I do not disagree, in fact, however the major motive that I am suspicious of know-how like screens and formal literacy instruction within the early years is that each know-how tends to standardize, altering kids in ways in which restrict their studying capability in usually unexpected and regrettable methods.
These early years are a singular alternative for brand spanking new people to interact the world as we have developed to interact it. The applied sciences will all the time be there, however that is the solely alternative any of us should put our fingers on the world earlier than it’s standardized, commodified, and packaged. It is the one time we have now to play, be taught, and deeply perceive earlier than we have been modified, without end, by our applied sciences.
John Dewey famously wrote, “Schooling is just not a preparation for all times, training is life itself.” That is what I attempt to supply to younger kids: the expertise of life itself. And that, a minimum of for this treasured time, means, to the diploma potential, with out the colonization of know-how.
******
I put numerous effort and time into this weblog. If you would like to assist me please take into account a small contribution to the trigger. Thanks!
